Parks Grant Programs
Environmental Protection Fund (EPF) and Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)
Applications
Separate program applications are available, depending on the type of project proposed. The Parks application
is to be used for projects to preserve, rehabilitate or restore lands, waters or structures for use by all
segments of the population for park, recreation or conservation purposes, including such things as playgrounds,
courts, rinks, community gardens and facilities for swimming, boating, picnicking, hunting, fishing, camping or
other recreational activities. While this application is used for both the EPF and LWCF programs, there are
differences between the programs, some of which include:
|
EPF |
LWCF |
- Federal funds are NOT eligible as match, State funds are
- Outdoor and Indoor recreational facilities ARE eligible
- Three year retroactivity (from application deadline) on some project elements
|
- Federal funds are NOT eligible as match, State funds are (certain restrictions apply)
- Outdoor recreational facilities are eligible, Indoor are not
- Not-for-Profit Corporations are not eligible
- Three year retroactivity (from submittal to National Park Service) for pre-agreement planning
costs only
|
Funding Priorities
Each year the Commissioner establishes program priorities for which projects will receive additional points.
Rating Criteria
The Priority Evaluation Form is based on the following rating criteria:
- the extent to which the project site has suffered from physical deterioration, decay, vandalism,
neglect or disinvestment or may be threatened with closure, demolition or inappropriate development;
- the relationship of the project to a local, regional and/or statewide planning document or other
assessment of need;
- the degree to which local recreation, conservation or open space deficiencies will be addressed
by the project;
- emergencies or disasters;
- State and Federal mandates;
- the ability of the project sponsor to initiate and complete the project on a timely basis, at a reasonable
cost, and operate or maintain the completed project;
- annual programmatic and funding priorities;
- the extent to which the project protects, enhances or interprets natural, cultural or historic
resources; and
- the degree to which the project will primarily serve either a densely populated area or an area
where a substantial proportion of the population is of low income or otherwise disadvantaged or
underserved.
Among the rating criteria, the Commissioner may award any of the following factors up to
ten points for a maximum of ten points. All applications will be reviewed for the relevance of these to the project
scope:
- the geographic distribution of other fundable projects in any given application cycle;
consideration will be given to projects in areas that have or have not received funding in recent cycles or where
funding is not commensurate with the population of the area. This will be based on the proximity to other funded
sites and the diversity of projects being funded on a regional and local basis, as well as the service area of the
developed or planned facilities.
- the extent to which the project will maximize the use and accessibility of a facility;
consideration will be given to projects where funding will allow underutilized facilities to be accessed or to develop
underutilized resources for public use. This will be based on the resources within a facility, the use of those
resources and whether the proposed project will help the facility approach its carrying capacity or increase its
carrying capacity to allow greater public use.
- special engineering, environmental and historic preservation concerns or benefits;
consideration will be given to develop unique resources and facilities or to develop innovative approaches to the
care of valuable resources. This will be based on the type of resource being developed or rehabilitated; its
uniqueness on a local, regional, statewide and national basis; the ability of an innovative technology to address an
emergency or mitigate future problems; how well a technology can be "exported" for use on other properties and
resources; and how/if the project will allow a visitor experience that would not otherwise be available.
- the past performance, if any, of the project sponsor on previous projects, including its compliance with Equal
Employment Opportunity and Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprise programs;
consideration will be given to how timely an applicant completed previous projects, including its reporting
requirements; how successful it was in outreach, especially to minority- and woman-owned firms; the upkeep and
maintenance of the property; and its cooperation in allowing OPRHP to complete inspections and other follow-up
actions.
Applications will be reviewed, rated and awarded as ranked on a regional basis.
|